You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The skin prick test – European standards
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-3-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucie Heinzerling, Adriano Mari, Karl-Christian Bergmann, Megon Bresciani, Guido Burbach, Ulf Darsow, Stephen Durham, Wytske Fokkens, Mark Gjomarkaj, Tari Haahtela, Ana Todo Bom, Stefan Wöhrl, Howard Maibach, Richard Lockey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 5 | 23% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 5% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 5% |
| Jordan | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,001 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 988 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 186 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 109 | 11% |
| Researcher | 80 | 8% |
| Other | 74 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 7% |
| Other | 185 | 18% |
| Unknown | 293 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 366 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 66 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 43 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 4% |
| Other | 105 | 10% |
| Unknown | 317 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,409,964
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#44
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,558
of 294,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.