You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interplay Between Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without a Brachytherapy Boost for Optimal Treatment of High-risk Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Oncology, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6871 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amar U Kishan, Alison Steigler, James W Denham, Almudena Zapatero, Araceli Guerrero, David Joseph, Xavier Maldonado, Jessica K Wong, Bradley J Stish, Robert T Dess, Avinash Pilar, Chandana Reddy, Trude B Wedde, Wolfgang A Lilleby, Ryan Fiano, Gregory S Merrick, Richard G Stock, D Jeffrey Demanes, Brian J Moran, Phuoc T Tran, Santiago Martin, Rafael Martinez-Monge, Daniel J Krauss, Eyad I Abu-Isa, Thomas M Pisansky, C Richard Choo, Daniel Y Song, Stephen Greco, Curtiland Deville, Todd McNutt, Theodore L DeWeese, Ashley E Ross, Jay P Ciezki, Derya Tilki, R Jeffrey Karnes, Jeffrey J Tosoian, Nicholas G Nickols, Prashant Bhat, David Shabsovich, Jesus E Juarez, Tommy Jiang, T Martin Ma, Michael Xiang, Rebecca Philipson, Albert Chang, Patrick A Kupelian, Matthew B Rettig, Felix Y Feng, Alejandro Berlin, Jonathan D Tward, Brian J Davis, Robert E Reiter, Michael L Steinberg, David Elashoff, Paul C Boutros, Eric M Horwitz, Rahul D Tendulkar, Daniel E Spratt, Tahmineh Romero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 54% |
| Scientists | 12 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 21% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#332,185
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#545
of 3,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,695
of 462,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#8
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.