↓ Skip to main content

The role of the Valuer-General in the calculation of compensation for expropriation: A comparative analysis between South African and Australian law

Overview of attention for article published in South African Journal on Human Rights, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of the Valuer-General in the calculation of compensation for expropriation: A comparative analysis between South African and Australian law
Published in
South African Journal on Human Rights, January 2022
DOI 10.1080/02587203.2021.2012819
Authors

Theo Boshoff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#13,012,667
of 20,993,108 outputs
Outputs from South African Journal on Human Rights
#134
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,091
of 366,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Journal on Human Rights
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,993,108 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them