↓ Skip to main content

Looking for Leisure in All the Wrong Places: What the Ju/ ’hoansi Can Teach Us About Leisure

Overview of attention for article published in Leisure Sciences, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Looking for Leisure in All the Wrong Places: What the Ju/ ’hoansi Can Teach Us About Leisure
Published in
Leisure Sciences, January 2022
DOI 10.1080/01490400.2022.2026846
Authors

Chris A. B. Zajchowski, Daniel L. Dustin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#20,400,885
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Leisure Sciences
#431
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#409,915
of 499,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leisure Sciences
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.