↓ Skip to main content

The Updated Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention of 1949

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Journal of International Law, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Updated Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention of 1949
Published in
Chinese Journal of International Law, January 2022
DOI 10.1093/chinesejil/jmac001
Authors

Wang Haiping

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#18,582,513
of 20,918,346 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of International Law
#169
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,290
of 363,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of International Law
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,918,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.