↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Effects of enriched-potassium diet on cardiorespiratory outcomes in experimental non-ischemic chronic heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Research, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Effects of enriched-potassium diet on cardiorespiratory outcomes in experimental non-ischemic chronic heart failure
Published in
Biological Research, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40659-022-00370-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karla G. Schwarz, Katherin V. Pereyra, Camilo Toledo, David C. Andrade, Hugo S. Díaz, Esteban Díaz-Jara, Domiziana Ortolani, Angélica Rios-Gallardo, Paulina Arias, Alexandra Las Heras, Ignacio Vera, Fernando C. Ortiz, Nibaldo C. Inestrosa, Carlos P. Vio, Rodrigo Del Rio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,358,450
of 21,513,077 outputs
Outputs from Biological Research
#189
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,804
of 390,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,513,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them