↓ Skip to main content

Comparative genomic analysis of peruvian strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative genomic analysis of peruvian strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Published in
Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, May 2016
DOI 10.17843/rpmesp.2016.332.2192
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Tarazona, Marco Galarza, Kelly S Levano, Heinner Guio

Abstract

To comparatively analyze three genomic sequences of Mycobacterium tuberculosis(MTB), including sensitive (INS-SEN), multi-drug-resistant (INS-MDR), and extremely drug-resistant (INS-XDR) strains, collected in Lima, Peru. Specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified in the INS SEN, INS-MDR, and INS-XDR strains according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The three MTB genomes were compared and a molecular phylogeny was constructed with 27 MTB strains from other studies available from the Genbank database. The specific SNPs in each genome were organized in clusters of orthologous groups (COGs). The genomic analysis allowed for the identification of a set of SNPs associated mainly with virulence determinants (family of mce proteins, polyketides, phiRv1, transposase, and methyltransferases, and other related to vitamin synthesis). A close correlation between the INS-MDR and INS-XDR strains was observed, with only a 6.1% difference in SNPs; however, the INS-SEN strain had 50.2% and 50.3% different SNPs from the MDR and XDR strains, respectively. The molecular phylogeny grouped the Peruvian strains within the LAM lineage and closely to the F11 and KZN strains from South Africa. High similarity (99.9%) was noted between the INS-SEN strain and the F11 South African strain with broadglobal scope, while the analysis of the INS-MDR and INS-XDR strains showed a likely expansion of the KZN family, a South African strain with high virulence and pathogenicity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 25%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Unspecified 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#277
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,886
of 353,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.