↓ Skip to main content

The continuing unfairness of death qualification: Changing death penalty attitudes and capital jury selection.

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Public Policy and Law, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The continuing unfairness of death qualification: Changing death penalty attitudes and capital jury selection.
Published in
Psychology, Public Policy and Law, February 2022
DOI 10.1037/law0000335
Authors

Craig Haney, Eileen L. Zurbriggen, Joanna M. Weill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,207,357
of 21,301,913 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#412
of 471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,079
of 377,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,301,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them