| Title |
Systemic safety inequities for people with learning disabilities: a qualitative integrative analysis of the experiences of English health and social care for people with learning disabilities, their families and carers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12939-021-01612-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren Ramsey, Abigail Albutt, Kayley Perfetto, Naomi Quinton, John Baker, Gemma Louch, Jane O’Hara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 49% |
| Australia | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 60% |
| Scientists | 12 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#896,832
of 24,833,004 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#101
of 2,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,941
of 513,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.