↓ Skip to main content

Trophic cascades in 3D: Network analysis reveals how apex predators structure ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
89 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trophic cascades in 3D: Network analysis reveals how apex predators structure ecosystems
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, October 2016
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12663
Authors

Wallach, Arian D., Dekker, Anthony H., Lurgi, Miguel, Montoya, Jose M., Fordham, Damien A., Ritchie, Euan G., Arian D. Wallach, Anthony H. Dekker, Miguel Lurgi, Jose M. Montoya, Damien A. Fordham, Euan G. Ritchie, Diana Fisher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Portugal 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 103 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Master 20 18%
Unspecified 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 54%
Environmental Science 28 25%
Unspecified 17 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#250,946
of 12,382,182 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#90
of 1,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,733
of 263,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#9
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,382,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.