You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of Face Mask or Respirator Use in Indoor Public Settings for Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infection — California, February–December 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm7106e1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin L. Andrejko, Jake M. Pry, Jennifer F. Myers, Nozomi Fukui, Jennifer L. DeGuzman, John Openshaw, James P. Watt, Joseph A. Lewnard, Seema Jain, Yasmine Abdulrahim, Camilla M. Barbaduomo, Miriam I. Bermejo, Julia Cheunkarndee, Adrian F. Cornejo, Savannah Corredor, Najla Dabbagh, Zheng N. Dong, Ashly Dyke, Anna T. Fang, Diana Felipe, Paulina M. Frost, Timothy Ho, Mahsa H. Javadi, Amandeep Kaur, Amanda Lam, Sophia S. Li, Monique Miller, Jessica Ni, Hyemin Park, Diana J. Poindexter, Helia Samani, Shrey Saretha, Maya Spencer, Michelle M. Spinosa, Vivian H. Tran, Nikolina Walas, Christine Wan, Erin Xavier |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26,535 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5163 | 19% |
| Canada | 1374 | 5% |
| Japan | 1046 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 694 | 3% |
| Mexico | 430 | 2% |
| Germany | 408 | 2% |
| Australia | 367 | 1% |
| Brazil | 258 | <1% |
| France | 199 | <1% |
| Other | 2282 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14314 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23892 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1181 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 917 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 489 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18082. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#45
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#3
of 4,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 518,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#2
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 342.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.