↓ Skip to main content

Case in favor of the N*(1700)(3/2−)

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case in favor of the N*(1700)(3/2−)
Published in
Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, May 2013
DOI 10.1103/physrevc.87.055204
Authors

E. J. Garzon, J. J. Xie, E. Oset

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#23,065,269
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics
#5,071
of 7,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,670
of 206,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics
#51
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,960 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.