You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vaccine Hesitancy Among Religious Groups: Reasons Underlying This Phenomenon and Communication Strategies to Rebuild Trust
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.824560 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annie Kibongani Volet, Cristina Scavone, Daniel Catalán-Matamoros, Annalisa Capuano |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Turkey | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,113,964
of 24,544,893 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,708
of 12,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,622
of 513,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#100
of 841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,544,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.