↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin supplementation for preventing miscarriage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin supplementation for preventing miscarriage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004073.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rumbold A, Middleton P, Pan N, Crowther CA, Rumbold, Alice, Middleton, Philippa, Pan, Ning, Crowther, Caroline A

Abstract

Miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy that can be caused by a wide range of factors. Poor dietary intake of vitamins has been associated with an increased risk of miscarriage, therefore supplementing women with vitamins either prior to or in early pregnancy may help prevent miscarriage.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Ireland 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Lebanon 1 1%
Unknown 79 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Psychology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 6 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,531,399
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,832
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,011
of 291,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#282
of 392 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 392 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.