↓ Skip to main content

How women organize social networks different from men

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
158 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How women organize social networks different from men
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep01214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Szell, Stefan Thurner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 158 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Japan 4 2%
France 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 182 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 20%
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Master 32 15%
Other 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 14%
Computer Science 26 12%
Psychology 19 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 8%
Physics and Astronomy 17 8%
Other 60 28%
Unknown 42 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 305. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#114,644
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,456
of 142,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#662
of 292,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.