↓ Skip to main content

Short‐term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short‐term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004687.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

A A Abbass, J T Hancock, J Henderson, S Kisely, Abbass AA, Hancock JT, Henderson J, Kisely S, Abbass, Allan A, Hancock, Jeffrey T, Henderson, Julie, Kisely, Steve R

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies (STPP) for a broad range of psychological and somatic disorders have been developed and studied. Four published meta-analyses of STPP, using different methods and samples, have found conflicting results.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Israel 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 11 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#323,066
of 12,433,783 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#831
of 8,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,233
of 11,859,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#820
of 8,242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,433,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,859,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.