↓ Skip to main content

Reconstructing the emergence of a lethal infectious disease of wildlife supports a key role for spread through translocations by humans

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
30 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstructing the emergence of a lethal infectious disease of wildlife supports a key role for spread through translocations by humans
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2016
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.0952
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen J. Price, Trenton W. J. Garner, Andrew A. Cunningham, Tom E. S. Langton, Richard A. Nichols

Abstract

There have been few reconstructions of wildlife disease emergences, despite their extensive impact on biodiversity and human health. This is in large part attributable to the lack of structured and robust spatio-temporal datasets. We overcame logistical problems of obtaining suitable information by using data from a citizen science project and formulating spatio-temporal models of the spread of a wildlife pathogen (genus Ranavirus, infecting amphibians). We evaluated three main hypotheses for the rapid increase in disease reports in the UK: that outbreaks were being reported more frequently, that climate change had altered the interaction between hosts and a previously widespread pathogen, and that disease was emerging due to spatial spread of a novel pathogen. Our analysis characterized localized spread from nearby ponds, consistent with amphibian dispersal, but also revealed a highly significant trend for elevated rates of additional outbreaks in localities with higher human population density-pointing to human activities in also spreading the virus. Phylogenetic analyses of pathogen genomes support the inference of at least two independent introductions into the UK. Together these results point strongly to humans repeatedly translocating ranaviruses into the UK from other countries and between UK ponds, and therefore suggest potential control measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Researcher 29 20%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 39%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 10%
Environmental Science 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#692,356
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,723
of 11,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,164
of 330,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#20
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.