↓ Skip to main content

Resolving the origin of the multimode Jahn–Teller effect in metallophthalocyanines

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resolving the origin of the multimode Jahn–Teller effect in metallophthalocyanines
Published in
Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2016
DOI 10.1039/c6cp03859j
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lj. Andjelković, S. Stepanović, F. Vlahović, M. Zlatar, M. Gruden

Abstract

A detailed Density Functional Theory (DFT) analysis was performed in order to study the multimode Jahn-Teller (JT) problem in the electronic ground state of manganese phthalocyanine (MnPc). A comparison with the magnesium phthalocyanine ion (MgPc(-)) and the phthalocyanine trianion (Pc(3(-))), also prone to the JT effect, is presented. Our results clarify the origin and provide the microscopic insight into the symmetry breaking process. The JT distortion is highly influenced by the coordination of phthalocyanine to the Mn(II) ion, and occurs over the whole system, while the MgPc(-) complex ion possesses mainly ligand-based instability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 35%
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 35%
Chemistry 6 26%
Materials Science 3 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#7,638
of 17,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,392
of 399,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#424
of 988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,005 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.