Vitamin C for preventing and treating the common cold

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 8,371)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin C for preventing and treating the common cold
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000980.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hemilä H, Chalker E, Hemilä H; Chalker E

Abstract

Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) for preventing and treating the common cold has been a subject of controversy for 70 years.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 335 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Peru 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 31%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Other 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 8 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1026. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,128
of 7,001,360 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 8,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28
of 295,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,001,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.