You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retention of the rural allied health workforce in New South Wales: a comparison of public and private practitioners
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheila Keane, Michelle Lincoln, Margaret Rolfe, Tony Smith |
| Abstract |
Policy initiatives to improve retention of the rural health workforce have relied primarily on evidence for rural doctors, most of whom practice under a private business model. Much of the literature for rural allied health (AH) workforce focuses on the public sector. The AH professions are diverse, with mixed public, private or combined practice settings. This study explores sector differences in factors affecting retention of rural AH professionals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2013.
All research outputs
#18,329,207
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,437
of 7,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,603
of 281,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#91
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.