You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11454 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John A Kellum, Norbert Lameire, for the KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group |
| Abstract |
ABSTRACT: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious problem affecting millions and causing death and disability for many. In 2012, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes completed the first ever, international, multidisciplinary, clinical practice guideline for AKI. The guideline is based on evidence review and appraisal, and covers AKI definition, risk assessment, evaluation, prevention, and treatment. In this review we summarize key aspects of the guideline including definition and staging of AKI, as well as evaluation and nondialytic management. Contrast-induced AKI and management of renal replacement therapy will be addressed in a separate review. Treatment recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant trials. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Limitations of the evidence are discussed and a detailed rationale for each recommendation is provided. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 963 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 950 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 111 | 12% |
| Researcher | 103 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 99 | 10% |
| Other | 93 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 85 | 9% |
| Other | 227 | 24% |
| Unknown | 245 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 500 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 69 | 7% |
| Unknown | 281 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,190,993
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#973
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,256
of 295,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.