↓ Skip to main content

Not such friendly banter? GPs and psychiatrists against the systematic denigration of their specialties

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 2,084)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
84 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Not such friendly banter? GPs and psychiatrists against the systematic denigration of their specialties
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, October 2016
DOI 10.3399/bjgp16x687169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maureen Baker, Simon Wessely, Daniel Openshaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Master 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 86%
Psychology 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#79,294
of 8,859,682 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#27
of 2,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,256
of 255,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,859,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.