You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007950.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luz Maria De-Regil, Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas, Ana C Fernández-Gaxiola, Pura Rayco-Solon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 300 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 52 | 17% |
| Spain | 43 | 14% |
| Canada | 10 | 3% |
| Australia | 9 | 3% |
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Ireland | 7 | 2% |
| Argentina | 6 | 2% |
| Chile | 5 | 2% |
| Colombia | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 115 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 220 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 50 | 17% |
| Scientists | 27 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,010 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1005 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 166 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 144 | 14% |
| Researcher | 97 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 5% |
| Other | 162 | 16% |
| Unknown | 317 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 288 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 156 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 3% |
| Other | 103 | 10% |
| Unknown | 359 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 293. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#115,700
of 24,904,819 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#209
of 13,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,763
of 401,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,904,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.