↓ Skip to main content

The Accuracy and Consistency of 3D Elevation Program Data: A Systematic Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Remote Sensing, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Accuracy and Consistency of 3D Elevation Program Data: A Systematic Analysis
Published in
Remote Sensing, February 2022
DOI 10.3390/rs14040940
Authors

Jason Stoker, Barry Miller

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 25 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,415,316
of 23,720,526 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#3,916
of 11,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,472
of 560,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#133
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,720,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,937 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 560,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.