↓ Skip to main content

The phylogenetic distribution of ultraviolet sensitivity in birds

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The phylogenetic distribution of ultraviolet sensitivity in birds
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-13-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Ödeen, Olle Håstad

Abstract

Colour vision in birds can be categorized into two classes, the ultraviolet (UVS) and violet sensitive (VS). Their phylogenetic distributions have traditionally been regarded as highly conserved. However, the complicated nature of acquiring spectral sensitivities from cone photoreceptors meant that until recently, only a few species had actually been studied. Whether birds are UVS or VS can nowadays be inferred from a wide range of species via genomic sequencing of the UV/violet SWS1 cone opsin gene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Chile 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 207 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 24%
Student > Master 44 20%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Other 14 6%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 32 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 57%
Environmental Science 16 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 40 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#980,160
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#202
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,399
of 296,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.