You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The phylogenetic distribution of ultraviolet sensitivity in birds
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-13-36 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anders Ödeen, Olle Håstad |
Abstract |
Colour vision in birds can be categorized into two classes, the ultraviolet (UVS) and violet sensitive (VS). Their phylogenetic distributions have traditionally been regarded as highly conserved. However, the complicated nature of acquiring spectral sensitivities from cone photoreceptors meant that until recently, only a few species had actually been studied. Whether birds are UVS or VS can nowadays be inferred from a wide range of species via genomic sequencing of the UV/violet SWS1 cone opsin gene. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
United States | 2 | 12% |
Chad | 1 | 6% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 6% |
Finland | 1 | 6% |
Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
Norway | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
Scientists | 4 | 24% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 2% |
Chile | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Panama | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 207 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 24% |
Student > Master | 44 | 20% |
Researcher | 32 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
Other | 14 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 10% |
Unknown | 32 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 126 | 57% |
Environmental Science | 16 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 1% |
Other | 15 | 7% |
Unknown | 40 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#980,160
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#202
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,399
of 296,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.