↓ Skip to main content

The Genomics of Colorectal Cancer in Populations with African and European AncestryGenomics, Colorectal Cancer, and African and European Ancestry

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
45 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Genomics of Colorectal Cancer in Populations with African and European AncestryGenomics, Colorectal Cancer, and African and European Ancestry
Published in
Cancer Discovery, February 2022
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parvathi A. Myer, Jessica K. Lee, Russell W. Madison, Kith Pradhan, Justin Y. Newberg, Carmen R. Isasi, Samuel J. Klempner, Garrett M. Frampton, Jeffery S. Ross, Jeffrey M. Venstrom, Alexa B. Schrock, Sudipto Das, Leonard Augenlicht, Amit Verma, John M. Greally, Srilakshmi M. Raj, Sanjay Goel, Siraj M. Ali

Abstract

Blacks have a higher incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and worse survival rates when compared to Whites. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in 46,140 colorectal adenocarcinoma cases. Ancestry-informative markers identified 5,301 patients of African descent (AFR) and 33,770 patients of European descent (EUR). AFR were younger, had fewer MSI-H tumors, and had significantly more frequent alterations in KRAS, APC, and PIK3CA. AFR had increased frequency of KRAS mutations specifically KRAS G12D and KRAS G13. There were no differences in rates of actionable kinase driver alterations (HER2, MET, NTRK, ALK, ROS1, RET). In patients with young onset CRC (<50 years), AFR and EUR had similar frequency of MSI-H and TMB-H tumors, and strikingly different trends in APC mutations by age, as well as differences in MAPK pathway alterations. These findings inform treatment decisions, impact prognosis, and underscore the need for model systems representative of our diverse US population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 21 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 21 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,251,693
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#638
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,843
of 450,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#35
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.