↓ Skip to main content

Horizontal gene transfer of epigenetic machinery and evolution of parasitism in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum and other apicomplexans

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Horizontal gene transfer of epigenetic machinery and evolution of parasitism in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum and other apicomplexans
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-13-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandeep P Kishore, John W Stiller, Kirk W Deitsch

Abstract

The acquisition of complex transcriptional regulatory abilities and epigenetic machinery facilitated the transition of the ancestor of apicomplexans from a free-living organism to an obligate parasite. The ability to control sophisticated gene expression patterns enabled these ancient organisms to evolve several differentiated forms, invade multiple hosts and evade host immunity. How these abilities were acquired remains an outstanding question in protistan biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 93 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 29%
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 17%
Computer Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,241,142
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,257
of 3,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,040
of 298,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#25
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.