↓ Skip to main content

Prophylactic vitamin K for vitamin K deficiency bleeding in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prophylactic vitamin K for vitamin K deficiency bleeding in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002776
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renee M Puckett, Martin Offringa

Abstract

Vitamin K deficiency can cause bleeding in an infant in the first weeks of life. This is known as Hemorrhagic Disease of the Newborn (HDN). HDN is divided into three categories: early, classic and late HDN. Early HDN occurs within 24 hours post partum and falls outside the scope of this review. Classic HDN occurs on days one to seven; common bleeding sites are gastrointestinal, cutaneous, nasal and from a circumcision. Late HDN occurs from week 2-12; the most common bleeding sites are intracranial, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal. Vitamin K is commonly given prophylactically after birth for the prevention of HDN, but the preferred route is uncertain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 93 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 19%
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 18 18%
Other 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Unspecified 9 9%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 10 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#621,938
of 12,493,082 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,860
of 8,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,391
of 254,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,493,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.