↓ Skip to main content

Use of a community advisory board to build equitable algorithms for participation in clinical trials: a protocol paper for HoPeNET

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Health & Care Informatics, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of a community advisory board to build equitable algorithms for participation in clinical trials: a protocol paper for HoPeNET
Published in
BMJ Health & Care Informatics, February 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100453
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Farmer, Foster Osei Baah, Faustine Williams, Erika Ortiz-Chapparo, Valerie M Mitchell, Latifa Jackson, Billy Collins, Lennox Graham, Gwenyth R Wallen, Tiffany M Powell-Wiley, Allan Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 9%
Unspecified 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 31 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Unspecified 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 32 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,983,559
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Health & Care Informatics
#191
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,335
of 456,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Health & Care Informatics
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.