You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
MARGINALISM AND SCOPE IN THE EARLY METHODENSTREIT
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.1017/s1053837220000413 |
Authors |
Jens van ’t Klooster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 15% |
Belgium | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 51 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 72 | 88% |
Scientists | 8 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#813,874
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#5
of 449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,911
of 536,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 536,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them