Chapter title |
Ionic Liquids in Capillary Electrophoresis.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 8 |
Book title |
Capillary Electrophoresis
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6403-1_8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6401-7, 978-1-4939-6403-1
|
Authors |
Ulrike Holzgrabe, Joachim Wahl |
Editors |
Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin |
Abstract |
Recently, a great interest was drawn toward ionic liquids (ILs) in analytical separation techniques. ILs possess many properties making them excellent additives in capillary electrophoresis (CE) background electrolytes (BGE). The most important property is the charge of the dissolved ions in BGE enabling the cations to interact with deprotonated silanol groups on the capillary surface and thereby modifying the electroosmotic flow (EOF). Ionic and/or proton donor-acceptor interactions between analyte and IL are possible interactions facilitating new kinds of separation mechanisms in CE. Further advantages of ILs are the high conductivity, the environmentally friendliness, and the good solubility for organic and inorganic compounds. The most commonly used ILs in capillary electrophoresis are dialkylimidazolium-based ILs, whereas for enantioseparation a lot of innovative chiral cations and anions were investigated.ILs are reported to be additives to a normal CE background electrolyte or the sole electrolyte in CE, nonaqueous CE (NACE), micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), and in enantioseparation. An overview of applications and separation mechanisms reported in the literature is given here, in addition to the enantioseparation of pseudoephedrine using tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBAC) as IL additive to an ammonium formate buffer containing β-cyclodextrin (β-CD). |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 33% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 3 | 50% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |