You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Custom‐made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006801.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fiona Hawke, Joshua Burns, Joel A Radford, Verona du Toit |
Abstract |
Custom foot orthoses are commonly recommended for the treatment of foot pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 17% |
France | 1 | 17% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 391 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 84 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 57 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 8% |
Researcher | 30 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 6% |
Other | 66 | 16% |
Unknown | 106 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 4% |
Psychology | 14 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 11 | 3% |
Other | 43 | 11% |
Unknown | 129 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#754,937
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,406
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,487
of 96,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.