↓ Skip to main content

Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006801.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Hawke, Joshua Burns, Joel A Radford, Verona du Toit

Abstract

Custom foot orthoses are commonly recommended for the treatment of foot pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 275 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 22%
Student > Bachelor 48 17%
Student > Postgraduate 27 9%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 46 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Psychology 11 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 64 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#416,121
of 16,603,833 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#970
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,875
of 255,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,603,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.