↓ Skip to main content

Group follow-up compared to individual clinic visits after structured education for type 1 diabetes: A cluster randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Group follow-up compared to individual clinic visits after structured education for type 1 diabetes: A cluster randomised controlled trial
Published in
Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean F. Dinneen, Mary Clare O’Hara, Molly Byrne, Diarmuid Smith, Christopher H. Courtney, Colm McGurk, Simon R. Heller, John Newell, Norma Coffey, Cathy Breen, Mary O'Scannail, Donal O'Shea

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of group follow-up with individual follow-up after participation in the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) structured education programme.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Unspecified 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 16 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 18%
Unspecified 8 16%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Psychology 4 8%
Other 7 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2013.
All research outputs
#9,669,441
of 12,091,208 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#1,219
of 1,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,975
of 294,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,091,208 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.