You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Group follow-up compared to individual clinic visits after structured education for type 1 diabetes: A cluster randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean F. Dinneen, Mary Clare O’Hara, Molly Byrne, Diarmuid Smith, Christopher H. Courtney, Colm McGurk, Simon R. Heller, John Newell, Norma Coffey, Cathy Breen, Mary O'Scannail, Donal O'Shea, for the Irish DAFNE Study Group |
| Abstract |
To compare the effectiveness of group follow-up with individual follow-up after participation in the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) structured education programme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 19% |
| Psychology | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,338,875
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#694
of 3,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,897
of 294,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.