You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-142 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert T Mathie, Suzanne M Lloyd, Lynn A Legg, Jürgen Clausen, Sian Moss, Jonathan RT Davidson, Ian Ford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 381 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 42 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 34 | 9% |
| India | 22 | 6% |
| United States | 16 | 4% |
| Germany | 14 | 4% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 6 | 2% |
| France | 5 | 1% |
| Norway | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Unknown | 208 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 316 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 8% |
| Scientists | 24 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 25% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 356. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#91,789
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#875
of 369,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.