↓ Skip to main content

Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: Strengthening the global budget

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
255 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: Strengthening the global budget
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, August 2012
DOI 10.1029/2012gb004375
Authors

Joshua L. Breithaupt, Joseph M. Smoak, Thomas J. Smith, Christian J. Sanders, Armando Hoare

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 372 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 17%
Student > Master 62 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Professor 27 7%
Other 70 18%
Unknown 56 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 135 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 59 15%
Engineering 8 2%
Chemistry 5 1%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 78 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,176,302
of 20,416,033 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#520
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,935
of 274,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,416,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.