↓ Skip to main content

The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response
Published in
Conservation Letters, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00164.x
Authors

John C. Z. Woinarski, Sarah Legge, James A. Fitzsimons, Barry J. Traill, Andrew A. Burbidge, Alaric Fisher, Ron S. C. Firth, Iain J. Gordon, Anthony D. Griffiths, Christopher N. Johnson, Norm L. McKenzie, Carol Palmer, Ian Radford, Brooke Rankmore, Euan G. Ritchie, Simon Ward, Mark Ziembicki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 191 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Other 13 6%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 72 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 49 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#695,202
of 24,203,404 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#259
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,345
of 111,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,203,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.