↓ Skip to main content

The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response
Published in
Conservation Letters, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00164.x
Authors

John C. Z. Woinarski, Sarah Legge, James A. Fitzsimons, Barry J. Traill, Andrew A. Burbidge, Alaric Fisher, Ron S. C. Firth, Iain J. Gordon, Anthony D. Griffiths, Christopher N. Johnson, Norm L. McKenzie, Carol Palmer, Ian Radford, Brooke Rankmore, Euan G. Ritchie, Simon Ward, Mark Ziembicki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 6 5%
United States 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 8 7%
Other 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 38%
Unspecified 11 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 7 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#680,925
of 12,363,980 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#294
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,677
of 295,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#23
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,363,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.