↓ Skip to main content

The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response
Published in
Conservation Letters, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00164.x
Authors

John C. Z. Woinarski, Sarah Legge, James A. Fitzsimons, Barry J. Traill, Andrew A. Burbidge, Alaric Fisher, Ron S. C. Firth, Iain J. Gordon, Anthony D. Griffiths, Christopher N. Johnson, Norm L. McKenzie, Carol Palmer, Ian Radford, Brooke Rankmore, Euan G. Ritchie, Simon Ward, Mark Ziembicki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 5 3%
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 150 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 12 8%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 64 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 28 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#488,798
of 17,625,695 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#199
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,268
of 293,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,625,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.