↓ Skip to main content

The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response
Published in
Conservation Letters, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00164.x
Authors

John C. Z. Woinarski, Sarah Legge, James A. Fitzsimons, Barry J. Traill, Andrew A. Burbidge, Alaric Fisher, Ron S. C. Firth, Iain J. Gordon, Anthony D. Griffiths, Christopher N. Johnson, Norm L. McKenzie, Carol Palmer, Ian Radford, Brooke Rankmore, Euan G. Ritchie, Simon Ward, Mark Ziembicki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 6 5%
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 121 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 56 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 35%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 19 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#915,578
of 14,350,170 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#361
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,282
of 276,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,350,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.