↓ Skip to main content

High-resolution quantitative imaging of mammalian and bacterial cells using stable isotope mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-resolution quantitative imaging of mammalian and bacterial cells using stable isotope mass spectrometry
Published in
Journal of Biology, October 2006
DOI 10.1186/jbiol42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claude Lechene, Francois Hillion, Greg McMahon, Douglas Benson, Alan M Kleinfeld, J Patrick Kampf, Daniel Distel, Yvette Luyten, Joseph Bonventre, Dirk Hentschel, Kwon Moo Park, Susumu Ito, Martin Schwartz, Gilles Benichou, Georges Slodzian, Lechene C, Hillion F, McMahon G, Benson D, Kleinfeld AM, Kampf JP, Distel D, Luyten Y, Bonventre J, Hentschel D, Park KM, Ito S, Schwartz M, Benichou G, Slodzian G, Kwon Park

Abstract

Secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is an important tool for investigating isotopic composition in the chemical and materials sciences, but its use in biology has been limited by technical considerations. Multi-isotope imaging mass spectrometry (MIMS), which combines a new generation of SIMS instrument with sophisticated ion optics, labeling with stable isotopes, and quantitative image-analysis software, was developed to study biological materials.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 229 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 77 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Other 17 7%
Student > Master 14 6%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 19 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 38%
Chemistry 23 9%
Environmental Science 22 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Other 53 21%
Unknown 28 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2013.
All research outputs
#881,508
of 9,613,531 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biology
#16
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#855,597
of 8,959,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biology
#16
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,613,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,959,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.