↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Development and validation of self-efficacy and intention measures for spending time in nature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 814)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Development and validation of self-efficacy and intention measures for spending time in nature
Published in
BMC Psychology, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40359-022-00764-1
Pubmed ID
35241177
Authors

Jay E. Maddock, Courtney Suess, Gregory N. Bratman, Carissa Smock, Debra Kellstedt, Jeanette Gustat, Cynthia K. Perry, Andrew T. Kaczynski

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 16 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 16 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#743,774
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#48
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,637
of 441,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#3
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.