↓ Skip to main content

Expanding the role of reactive transport models in critical zone processes

Overview of attention for article published in Earth-Science Reviews, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
213 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expanding the role of reactive transport models in critical zone processes
Published in
Earth-Science Reviews, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.09.001
Authors

Li Li, Kate Maher, Alexis Navarre-Sitchler, Jenny Druhan, Christof Meile, Corey Lawrence, Joel Moore, Julia Perdrial, Pamela Sullivan, Aaron Thompson, Lixin Jin, Edward W. Bolton, Susan L. Brantley, William E. Dietrich, K. Ulrich Mayer, Carl I. Steefel, Albert Valocchi, John Zachara, Benjamin Kocar, Jennifer Mcintosh, Benjamin M. Tutolo, Mukesh Kumar, Eric Sonnenthal, Chen Bao, Joe Beisman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 360 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 27%
Researcher 68 19%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Student > Bachelor 19 5%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 68 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 112 31%
Environmental Science 58 16%
Engineering 35 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 7%
Chemistry 6 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 96 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,616,274
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Earth-Science Reviews
#512
of 1,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,583
of 424,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth-Science Reviews
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.