↓ Skip to main content

Expanding the role of reactive transport models in critical zone processes

Overview of attention for article published in Earth-Science Reviews, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expanding the role of reactive transport models in critical zone processes
Published in
Earth-Science Reviews, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.09.001
Authors

Li, Kate Maher, Alexis Navarre-Sitchler, Jenny Druhan, Christof Meile, Corey Lawrence, Joel Moore, Julia Perdrial, Pamela Sullivan, Aaron Thompson, Lixin Jin, Edward W. Bolton, Susan L. Brantley, William E. Dietrich, K. Ulrich Mayer, Carl I. Steefel, Albert Valocchi, John Zachara, Benjamin Kocar, Jennifer Mcintosh, Benjamin M. Tutolo, Mukesh Kumar, Eric Sonnenthal, Chen Bao, Joe Beisman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 277 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 30%
Researcher 58 21%
Student > Master 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 15 5%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 32 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 97 35%
Environmental Science 54 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Engineering 23 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 58 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,920,354
of 16,539,682 outputs
Outputs from Earth-Science Reviews
#253
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,797
of 272,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth-Science Reviews
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,539,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.