↓ Skip to main content

Clinical severity of, and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against, covid-19 from omicron, delta, and alpha SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United States: prospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical severity of, and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against, covid-19 from omicron, delta, and alpha SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United States: prospective observational study
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2021-069761
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam S Lauring, Mark W Tenforde, James D Chappell, Manjusha Gaglani, Adit A Ginde, Tresa McNeal, Shekhar Ghamande, David J Douin, H Keipp Talbot, Jonathan D Casey, Nicholas M Mohr, Anne Zepeski, Nathan I Shapiro, Kevin W Gibbs, D Clark Files, David N Hager, Arber Shehu, Matthew E Prekker, Heidi L Erickson, Matthew C Exline, Michelle N Gong, Amira Mohamed, Nicholas J Johnson, Vasisht Srinivasan, Jay S Steingrub, Ithan D Peltan, Samuel M Brown, Emily T Martin, Arnold S Monto, Akram Khan, Catherine L Hough, Laurence W Busse, Caitlin C Ten Lohuis, Abhijit Duggal, Jennifer G Wilson, Alexandra June Gordon, Nida Qadir, Steven Y Chang, Christopher Mallow, Carolina Rivas, Hilary M Babcock, Jennie H Kwon, Natasha Halasa, Carlos G Grijalva, Todd W Rice, William B Stubblefield, Adrienne Baughman, Kelsey N Womack, Jillian P Rhoads, Christopher J Lindsell, Kimberly W Hart, Yuwei Zhu, Katherine Adams, Stephanie J Schrag, Samantha M Olson, Miwako Kobayashi, Jennifer R Verani, Manish M Patel, Wesley H Self

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 822 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 318 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Student > Master 21 7%
Other 18 6%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 154 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 163 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1092. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,264
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#351
of 65,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#554
of 449,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#13
of 905 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 905 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.