You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Inclusion of Potentially Inappropriate Medicines for the Older Adults in the Brazilian Consensus in Accordance with International Criteria
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2022
Andréa Pecce Bento, Leonardo Costa Pereira, Kerolyn Ramos Garcia, Luiz Fernando Ramos Ferreira, Emília Vitória da Silva, Margô Gomes de Oliveira Karnikowski
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||4||50%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||38%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||17%|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||3||17%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||17%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||11%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,931,222 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
of 1,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 504,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,931,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.