↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
893 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
Title
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan
Published in
Nature, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature19793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Dong, Brandon Milholland, Jan Vijg

Abstract

Driven by technological progress, human life expectancy has increased greatly since the nineteenth century. Demographic evidence has revealed an ongoing reduction in old-age mortality and a rise of the maximum age at death, which may gradually extend human longevity. Together with observations that lifespan in various animal species is flexible and can be increased by genetic or pharmaceutical intervention, these results have led to suggestions that longevity may not be subject to strict, species-specific genetic constraints. Here, by analysing global demographic data, we show that improvements in survival with age tend to decline after age 100, and that the age at death of the world's oldest person has not increased since the 1990s. Our results strongly suggest that the maximum lifespan of humans is fixed and subject to natural constraints.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,097 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 893 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
China 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 868 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 167 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 155 17%
Student > Bachelor 126 14%
Student > Master 95 11%
Professor 63 7%
Other 166 19%
Unknown 121 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 178 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 173 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 102 11%
Social Sciences 43 5%
Neuroscience 42 5%
Other 201 23%
Unknown 154 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3308. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,681
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#179
of 93,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 322,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#4
of 1,026 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,026 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.