↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 60,407)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
524 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
Title
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan
Published in
Nature, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature19793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Dong, Brandon Milholland, Jan Vijg, Dong, Xiao, Milholland, Brandon, Vijg, Jan

Abstract

Driven by technological progress, human life expectancy has increased greatly since the nineteenth century. Demographic evidence has revealed an ongoing reduction in old-age mortality and a rise of the maximum age at death, which may gradually extend human longevity. Together with observations that lifespan in various animal species is flexible and can be increased by genetic or pharmaceutical intervention, these results have led to suggestions that longevity may not be subject to strict, species-specific genetic constraints. Here, by analysing global demographic data, we show that improvements in survival with age tend to decline after age 100, and that the age at death of the world's oldest person has not increased since the 1990s. Our results strongly suggest that the maximum lifespan of humans is fixed and subject to natural constraints.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,301 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 524 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
United States 6 1%
Germany 5 <1%
France 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 488 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 116 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 113 22%
Student > Bachelor 75 14%
Student > Master 65 12%
Professor 33 6%
Other 122 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 148 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 102 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 12%
Unspecified 45 9%
Neuroscience 25 5%
Other 142 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3336. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#133
of 11,818,178 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29
of 60,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 261,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 1,027 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,818,178 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,027 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.