here's a diplomatic trouvaille: 'Whether this era promises 2 increase the maximum life span of humans remains an open question' & reference goes 2 notorious V.i.j.g et al @nature paper https://t.co/EKv6hG8nYY even @sama took 4 granted, here's bold high
@hakyim A Nature paper where authors: Rounded off most of the actual data to zero. Assumed log(0) was equal to zero. Fit a regression to these 'data'. 🤔 If you use any actual data for this regression, you reach the opposite conclusion. https://t.co/M
Por muchas mejoras que introduzca la ciencia, no puede garantizar que vivamos más de 122 años. El envejecimiento se debe a la confluencia de demasiados problemas. https://t.co/A3a1D11CGF
115 años es el límite puesto en la hipótesis de Xiao Dong y otros (no recuerdo si @CassioMTurra era el que lo había comentado) https://t.co/EOw4C2fpjs
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/cfislVTjQc
@duncanwilcox @Kurz_Gesagt https://t.co/ZwoOhId8PS Here is a paper about our assumed maximum lifespan.
RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/NDzM83iJo1 https://t.co/YMT04fs1YR
@jornaldacbn Acho que não ein https://t.co/x5Z9QvhGLK
@jornaldacbn Manda pra ele https://t.co/x5Z9QvhGLK
البته من خبر خوب دارم براتون كه عمرمون محدوده https://t.co/tpkYAt6Ugq
RT @eaghay: خبر بد دارم واسه‌تون: حداکثر عمر انسان، ثابت و محدود به ظرفیت طبیعی گونه‌ی ماست. با پیشرفت علم بیشتر نمیشه. https://t.co/Jl2ubF…
RT @eaghay: خبر بد دارم واسه‌تون: حداکثر عمر انسان، ثابت و محدود به ظرفیت طبیعی گونه‌ی ماست. با پیشرفت علم بیشتر نمیشه. https://t.co/Jl2ubF…
RT @eaghay: خبر بد دارم واسه‌تون: حداکثر عمر انسان، ثابت و محدود به ظرفیت طبیعی گونه‌ی ماست. با پیشرفت علم بیشتر نمیشه. https://t.co/Jl2ubF…
خبر بد دارم واسه‌تون: حداکثر عمر انسان، ثابت و محدود به ظرفیت طبیعی گونه‌ی ماست. با پیشرفت علم بیشتر نمیشه. https://t.co/Jl2ubFWIk2
#Evidence for a limit to #HumanLifespan https://t.co/HWbWCw15Ji | via @NatureNews
RT @y_buckley: @LouiseJJohnson also see recent replies in Nature to this paper - useful for stats teaching https://t.co/k0EwVb5EQC
@LouiseJJohnson also see recent replies in Nature to this paper - useful for stats teaching https://t.co/k0EwVb5EQC
Ups! Faltó información científica, como muchas veces.... https://t.co/b3YK0ogw0k
RT @PabloRichly: @VickyMendizabal La población envejece pero no para siempre (al menos para el Homo sapiens sapiens) https://t.co/Hay3MbLZ6Z
@VickyMendizabal La población envejece pero no para siempre (al menos para el Homo sapiens sapiens) https://t.co/Hay3MbLZ6Z
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan? via Nature and a whole lot of comments... https://t.co/Pxm4wCZqP4 https://t.co/uhRjocJ0Pq ...1/2
ヒトの寿命の'natural limit'を〜115歳と推定した2016年Nature論文(https://t.co/hq3JUqjSci)に対して４件の反論と再反論がNature 2017年6月29日号に掲載されている https://t.co/i3g1BjMm1O
RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/4hkWQbYGX0
RT @sachdevps: New analysis shows the maximum lifespan of humans is fixed and subject to natural constraints https://t.co/YhGlP0I8cS @CHeB…
Human lifespan may have a natural limit that's unlikely to be exceeded, suggests an analysis. https://t.co/pNxKEUi6ti
@VN0VAIS @edyong209 @TheAtlantic Equally how could Nature publish this: https://t.co/RoTNDAWE8Q Is 'scientific click-bait' now a thing ?
RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…
RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…
RT @DominicTrepel: Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/D3GjTRae1x
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/D3GjTRae1x
@Xander_ExE1 @stillgray I think this is it: https://t.co/vPS0M6O5HQ
#Evidence for a limit to #HumanLifespan https://t.co/zk9RcfhtNh | via @NatureNews
RT @StuartJRitchie: So, Nature paper on 'human lifespan limit' makes this inference from those TWO points at the very end!? Total toss. htt…
RT @lamethodeFC: Article du 13/10/2016 > Mise en évidence d'une limite de la longévité ? https://t.co/y0IaKtm8F1 @nature #LaMethSci https:/…
#hacker #news Evidence for a limit to human lifespan - #YCombinator ... https://t.co/ryKS46LuUo
RT @lamethodeFC: Article du 13/10/2016 > Mise en évidence d'une limite de la longévité ? https://t.co/y0IaKtm8F1 @nature #LaMethSci https:/…
Article du 13/10/2016 > Mise en évidence d'une limite de la longévité ? https://t.co/y0IaKtm8F1 @nature #LaMethSci https://t.co/rv11ajRFY6
RT @enkefalon: The maximum lifespan of humans is fixed and subject to natural constraints https://t.co/gkMbHsspHk
The maximum lifespan of humans is fixed and subject to natural constraints https://t.co/gkMbHsspHk
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @nature: Human lifespan may have a natural limit that's unlikely to be exceeded, suggests an analysis this week https://t.co/ICArpoeeRJ…
RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c
RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c
RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c
RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c
RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c
RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c
RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c
RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c
Interesting how the abstract doesn't mention what they think that upper limit to human life span is! Presumably because it's a large number https://t.co/wzQP5PX9r7
"Vous voyez, les gens vivent plus longtemps: on peut reculer l'âge de la retraite, hein, " Et là, vous sortez ça: https://t.co/WhlwnYCebT
"Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c
@DrRichardCooke the link to the worst @nature paper in living memory: https://t.co/1Fa9Ny1eJo
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…
Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: https://t.co/oaL0l3YW9P)
@3rdKingsland the infamous one :) https://t.co/saFYhl189b
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/m7fuMkkWnf
An article published in the Journal of Nature indicates that human life expectancy is limited to approximately... https://t.co/fPDqLvDnxe
Finally know what I want to be when I grow up. Hopefully 101 y/o. 'Evidence for a limit to human lifespan' https://t.co/DTjR1aM8kE @nature
How long can you live? #lifespan #health #nature https://t.co/vOVYkCNzcu
@estevaolr @brains9 segue ae :) https://t.co/k8jRSngsaz
RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…
RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…
RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/8ENAZw0Wr1
RT @angel_h_merino: Límites de la supervivencia humana https://t.co/WoAwKI1LZ5 Foto #PierreGonnord https://t.co/I9ljVTIEi4
RT @angel_h_merino: Límites supervivencia humana: alrededor de 100 años (persona más longeva comprobada 122 años) https://t.co/WoAwKI1LZ5…
Límites supervivencia humana: alrededor de 100 años (persona más longeva comprobada 122 años) https://t.co/WoAwKI1LZ5 Foto #PierreGonnord https://t.co/BXqs56Oa91
Límites de la supervivencia humana https://t.co/WoAwKI1LZ5 Foto #PierreGonnord https://t.co/I9ljVTIEi4
RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…
RT @JuanGrvas: Evidence for a limit to human lifespan: 115 years. https://t.co/gdTgRf3LxS
RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…
RT @JuanGrvas: Evidence for a limit to human lifespan: 115 years. https://t.co/gdTgRf3LxS
RT @JuanGrvas: Cuando la prensa le encandile con "vida eterna terrenal" recuerde este Nature: 115 años, límite de la vida humana. https://t…
RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…
Cuando la prensa le encandile con "vida eterna terrenal" recuerde este Nature: 115 años, límite de la vida humana. https://t.co/gdTgRf3LxS
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan: 115 years. https://t.co/gdTgRf3LxS
RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…
Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view https://t.co/VjhMxWDCB4
Limit of human #lifespan. https://t.co/Fcr2n96UUq
♪人生115年、下天の許を比ぶれば〜 QT Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/nq7qDHkb5F
RT @StuartJRitchie: So, Nature paper on 'human lifespan limit' makes this inference from those TWO points at the very end!? Total toss. htt…
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/4jDqb8k4aI
RT @nature: Human lifespan may have a natural limit that's unlikely to be exceeded, suggests an analysis this week https://t.co/ICArpoeeRJ…
RT @nature: Human lifespan may have a natural limit that's unlikely to be exceeded suggests an analysis this week https://t.co/ICArpoeeRJ h…
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan : Nature : Nature Research https://t.co/sM7PgzMwVf
高齢者の死亡率や最高年齢などからヒトの平均寿命は大きく伸びてきたとされている。しかし、世界的な人口統計データを分析した結果、世界の死亡時最高年齢は伸びておらず、ヒトの最大寿命は自然拘束に依存して決まってると考えられる。https://t.co/BcBxOGQvec YK