Evidence for a limit to human lifespan

@duncanwilcox @Kurz_Gesagt https://t.co/ZwoOhId8PS Here is a paper about our assumed maximum lifespan.

RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…

https://t.co/HXCrtK5Wcp

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/NDzM83iJo1 https://t.co/YMT04fs1YR

@jornaldacbn Acho que não ein https://t.co/x5Z9QvhGLK

@jornaldacbn Manda pra ele https://t.co/x5Z9QvhGLK

البته من خبر خوب دارم براتون كه عمرمون محدوده https://t.co/tpkYAt6Ugq

RT @eaghay: خبر بد دارم واسه‌تون: حداکثر عمر انسان، ثابت و محدود به ظرفیت طبیعی گونه‌ی ماست. با پیشرفت علم بیشتر نمیشه. https://t.co/Jl2ubF…

RT @eaghay: خبر بد دارم واسه‌تون: حداکثر عمر انسان، ثابت و محدود به ظرفیت طبیعی گونه‌ی ماست. با پیشرفت علم بیشتر نمیشه. https://t.co/Jl2ubF…

RT @eaghay: خبر بد دارم واسه‌تون: حداکثر عمر انسان، ثابت و محدود به ظرفیت طبیعی گونه‌ی ماست. با پیشرفت علم بیشتر نمیشه. https://t.co/Jl2ubF…

خبر بد دارم واسه‌تون: حداکثر عمر انسان، ثابت و محدود به ظرفیت طبیعی گونه‌ی ماست. با پیشرفت علم بیشتر نمیشه. https://t.co/Jl2ubFWIk2

#Evidence for a limit to #HumanLifespan https://t.co/HWbWCw15Ji | via @NatureNews

RT @y_buckley: @LouiseJJohnson also see recent replies in Nature to this paper - useful for stats teaching https://t.co/k0EwVb5EQC

@LouiseJJohnson also see recent replies in Nature to this paper - useful for stats teaching https://t.co/k0EwVb5EQC

Ups! Faltó información científica, como muchas veces.... https://t.co/b3YK0ogw0k

RT @PabloRichly: @VickyMendizabal La población envejece pero no para siempre (al menos para el Homo sapiens sapiens) https://t.co/Hay3MbLZ6Z

@VickyMendizabal La población envejece pero no para siempre (al menos para el Homo sapiens sapiens) https://t.co/Hay3MbLZ6Z

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan? via Nature and a whole lot of comments... https://t.co/Pxm4wCZqP4 https://t.co/uhRjocJ0Pq ...1/2

ヒトの寿命の'natural limit'を〜115歳と推定した2016年Nature論文(https://t.co/hq3JUqjSci)に対して４件の反論と再反論がNature 2017年6月29日号に掲載されている https://t.co/i3g1BjMm1O

RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/4hkWQbYGX0

RT @sachdevps: New analysis shows the maximum lifespan of humans is fixed and subject to natural constraints https://t.co/YhGlP0I8cS @CHeB…

Human lifespan may have a natural limit that's unlikely to be exceeded, suggests an analysis. https://t.co/pNxKEUi6ti

@VN0VAIS @edyong209 @TheAtlantic Equally how could Nature publish this: https://t.co/RoTNDAWE8Q Is 'scientific click-bait' now a thing ?

RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…

RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…

RT @DominicTrepel: Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/D3GjTRae1x

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/D3GjTRae1x

@Xander_ExE1 @stillgray I think this is it: https://t.co/vPS0M6O5HQ

#Evidence for a limit to #HumanLifespan https://t.co/zk9RcfhtNh | via @NatureNews

RT @StuartJRitchie: So, Nature paper on 'human lifespan limit' makes this inference from those TWO points at the very end!? Total toss. htt…

RT @lamethodeFC: Article du 13/10/2016 > Mise en évidence d'une limite de la longévité ? https://t.co/y0IaKtm8F1 @nature #LaMethSci https:/…

#hacker #news Evidence for a limit to human lifespan - #YCombinator ... https://t.co/ryKS46LuUo

RT @lamethodeFC: Article du 13/10/2016 > Mise en évidence d'une limite de la longévité ? https://t.co/y0IaKtm8F1 @nature #LaMethSci https:/…

Article du 13/10/2016 > Mise en évidence d'une limite de la longévité ? https://t.co/y0IaKtm8F1 @nature #LaMethSci https://t.co/rv11ajRFY6

RT @enkefalon: The maximum lifespan of humans is fixed and subject to natural constraints https://t.co/gkMbHsspHk

The maximum lifespan of humans is fixed and subject to natural constraints https://t.co/gkMbHsspHk

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @nature: Human lifespan may have a natural limit that's unlikely to be exceeded, suggests an analysis this week https://t.co/ICArpoeeRJ…

RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

RT @freakonometrics: "Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

Interesting how the abstract doesn't mention what they think that upper limit to human life span is! Presumably because it's a large number https://t.co/wzQP5PX9r7

"Vous voyez, les gens vivent plus longtemps: on peut reculer l'âge de la retraite, hein, " Et là, vous sortez ça: https://t.co/WhlwnYCebT

"Evidence for a limit to human lifespan" https://t.co/S1ovKHTAek ht @PierreTherond https://t.co/dPSqDIUs4c

@DrRichardCooke the link to the worst @nature paper in living memory: https://t.co/1Fa9Ny1eJo

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

RT @StuartJRitchie: Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: http…

Another contender for worst paper of 2016: https://t.co/z2OUWWH9DA (& the story of how it got published in Nature: https://t.co/oaL0l3YW9P)

@3rdKingsland the infamous one :) https://t.co/saFYhl189b

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/m7fuMkkWnf

An article published in the Journal of Nature indicates that human life expectancy is limited to approximately... https://t.co/fPDqLvDnxe

3/3 FTR, I (who knows nothing about #demographics) called BS when it was published -- partly bc I hoped it was wrong https://t.co/tXWkJMrmFc

Finally know what I want to be when I grow up. Hopefully 101 y/o. 'Evidence for a limit to human lifespan' https://t.co/DTjR1aM8kE @nature

How long can you live? #lifespan #health #nature https://t.co/vOVYkCNzcu

@estevaolr @brains9 segue ae :) https://t.co/k8jRSngsaz

RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…

RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…

RT @yuji_ikegaya: ヒトの寿命は医療技術が進歩すればまだまだ伸びるという神話がありますが「実は現時点で最長寿齢（約115歳）はMAXに達しているのでは」という論文が今朝『ネイチャー』誌に出ました。こちら→https://t.co/cyVaoLSpHG（専門業界内…

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/8ENAZw0Wr1

RT @angel_h_merino: Límites de la supervivencia humana https://t.co/WoAwKI1LZ5 Foto #PierreGonnord https://t.co/I9ljVTIEi4

RT @angel_h_merino: Límites supervivencia humana: alrededor de 100 años (persona más longeva comprobada 122 años) https://t.co/WoAwKI1LZ5…

Límites supervivencia humana: alrededor de 100 años (persona más longeva comprobada 122 años) https://t.co/WoAwKI1LZ5 Foto #PierreGonnord https://t.co/BXqs56Oa91

Límites de la supervivencia humana https://t.co/WoAwKI1LZ5 Foto #PierreGonnord https://t.co/I9ljVTIEi4

RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/vtAukTJAHS from nature

RT @JuanGrvas: Evidence for a limit to human lifespan: 115 years. https://t.co/gdTgRf3LxS

RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…

RT @JuanGrvas: Evidence for a limit to human lifespan: 115 years. https://t.co/gdTgRf3LxS

RT @JuanGrvas: Cuando la prensa le encandile con "vida eterna terrenal" recuerde este Nature: 115 años, límite de la vida humana. https://t…

RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…

RT @JuanGrvas: Cuando la prensa le encandile con "vida eterna terrenal" recuerde este Nature: 115 años, límite de la vida humana. https://t…

Cuando la prensa le encandile con "vida eterna terrenal" recuerde este Nature: 115 años, límite de la vida humana. https://t.co/gdTgRf3LxS

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan: 115 years. https://t.co/gdTgRf3LxS

RT @DrSidMukherjee: Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view http…

Thoughts on this article on the limits of aging ? Writing about it, would like a statisticians and biologists view https://t.co/VjhMxWDCB4

Limit of human #lifespan. https://t.co/Fcr2n96UUq

♪人生115年、下天の許を比ぶれば〜 QT Evidence for a limit to human lifespan https://t.co/nq7qDHkb5F

RT @StuartJRitchie: So, Nature paper on 'human lifespan limit' makes this inference from those TWO points at the very end!? Total toss. htt…

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/4jDqb8k4aI

RT @nature: Human lifespan may have a natural limit that's unlikely to be exceeded, suggests an analysis this week https://t.co/ICArpoeeRJ…

RT @nature: Human lifespan may have a natural limit that's unlikely to be exceeded suggests an analysis this week https://t.co/ICArpoeeRJ h…

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan : Nature : Nature Research https://t.co/sM7PgzMwVf

高齢者の死亡率や最高年齢などからヒトの平均寿命は大きく伸びてきたとされている。しかし、世界的な人口統計データを分析した結果、世界の死亡時最高年齢は伸びておらず、ヒトの最大寿命は自然拘束に依存して決まってると考えられる。https://t.co/BcBxOGQvec YK