You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum: Pancreatic stellate cells support tumour metabolism through autophagic alanine secretion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature19851 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristovão M. Sousa, Douglas E. Biancur, Xiaoxu Wang, Christopher J. Halbrook, Mara H. Sherman, Li Zhang, Daniel Kremer, Rosa F. Hwang, Agnes K. Witkiewicz, Haoqiang Ying, John M. Asara, Ronald M. Evans, Lewis C. Cantley, Costas A. Lyssiotis, Alec C. Kimmelman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,756,307
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#39,090
of 91,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,167
of 319,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#746
of 1,026 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,026 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.