↓ Skip to main content

Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2013
DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.12165
Pubmed ID
Authors

SM O'Neill, AS Khashan, LC Kenny, RA Greene, TB Henriksen, JE Lutomski, PM Kearney

Abstract

Caesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and the long-term effects are unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,160,404
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#1,048
of 5,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,997
of 157,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.