You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1471-0528.12165 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
SM O'Neill, AS Khashan, LC Kenny, RA Greene, TB Henriksen, JE Lutomski, PM Kearney |
| Abstract |
Caesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and the long-term effects are unknown. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 64% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,923,764
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#1,232
of 6,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,624
of 287,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#22
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.