You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advances in plant gene-targeted and functional markers: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-9-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Péter Poczai, Ildikó Varga, Maarja Laos, András Cseh, Neil Bell, Jari PT Valkonen, Jaakko Hyvönen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 362 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 20% |
| Researcher | 77 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 237 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 49 | 13% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 4% |
| Unknown | 64 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#760
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,315
of 302,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.