↓ Skip to main content

Localized seismic deformation in the upper mantle revealed by dense seismic arrays

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
53 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Localized seismic deformation in the upper mantle revealed by dense seismic arrays
Published in
Science, October 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aaf1370
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asaf Inbal, Jean Paul Ampuero, Robert W Clayton

Abstract

Seismicity along continental transform faults is usually confined to the upper half of the crust, but the Newport-Inglewood fault (NIF), a major fault traversing the Los Angeles basin, is seismically active down to the upper mantle. We use seismic array analysis to illuminate the seismogenic root of the NIF beneath Long Beach, California, and identify seismicity in an actively deforming localized zone penetrating the lithospheric mantle. Deep earthquakes, which are spatially correlated with geochemical evidence of a fluid pathway from the mantle, as well as with a sharp vertical offset in the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, exhibit narrow size distribution and weak temporal clustering. We attribute these characteristics to a transition from strong to weak interaction regimes in a system of seismic asperities embedded in a ductile fault zone matrix.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 130 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 30%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Master 5 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 49 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 41 31%
Materials Science 7 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Chemistry 5 4%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 54 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 200. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#200,408
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,757
of 83,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,905
of 328,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#101
of 1,140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.