↓ Skip to main content

A randomised controlled trial of three very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomised controlled trial of three very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3684-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Pears, Maaike Bijker, Katie Morton, Joana Vasconcelos, Richard A. Parker, Kate Westgate, Soren Brage, Ed Wilson, A. Toby Prevost, Ann-Louise Kinmonth, Simon Griffin, Stephen Sutton, Wendy Hardeman

Abstract

Very brief interventions (VBIs) for physical activity are promising, but there is uncertainty about their potential effectiveness and cost. We assessed potential efficacy, feasibility, acceptability, and cost of three VBIs in primary care, in order to select the most promising intervention for evaluation in a subsequent large-scale RCT. Three hundred and ninety four adults aged 40-74 years were randomised to a Motivational (n = 83), Pedometer (n = 74), or Combined (n = 80) intervention, delivered immediately after a preventative health check in primary care, or control (Health Check only; n = 157). Potential efficacy was measured as the probability of a positive difference between an intervention arm and the control arm in mean physical activity, measured by accelerometry at 4 weeks. For the primary outcome the estimated effect sizes (95 % CI) relative to the Control arm for the Motivational, Pedometer and Combined arms were respectively: +20.3 (-45.0, +85.7), +23.5 (-51.3, +98.3), and -3.1 (-69.3, +63.1) counts per minute. There was a73% probability of a positive effect on physical activity for each of the Motivational and Pedometer VBIs relative to control, but only 46 % for the Combined VBI. Only the Pedometer VBI was deliverable within 5 min. All VBIs were acceptable and low cost. Based on the four criteria, the Pedometer VBI was selected for evaluation in a large-scale trial. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN02863077 . Retrospectively registered 05/10/2012.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Researcher 14 21%
Unspecified 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 24%
Unspecified 14 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 21%
Psychology 8 12%
Sports and Recreations 5 8%
Other 9 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,063,568
of 13,590,700 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,195
of 9,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,611
of 267,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,590,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.