↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Social Media and Professional Development for Oncology Professionals

Overview of attention for article published in JCO Oncology Practice, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 1,090)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
195 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Media and Professional Development for Oncology Professionals
Published in
JCO Oncology Practice, August 2022
DOI 10.1200/op.21.00761
Pubmed ID
35312343
Authors

Anusha Chidharla, Audun Utengen, Deanna J. Attai, Emily K. Drake, G.J. van Londen, Ishwaria M. Subbiah, Elizabeth Henry, Martina Murphy, Maura M. Barry, Rami Manochakian, Scott Moerdler, Stacy Loeb, Stephanie L. Graff, Yan Leyfman, Michael A. Thompson, Merry J. Markham

Abstract

The use of social media continues to increase in health care and academia. Health care practice, particularly the oncologic field, is constantly changing because of new knowledge, evidence-based research, clinical trials, and government policies. Therefore, oncology trainees and professionals continue to strive to stay up-to-date with practice guidelines, research, and skills. Although social media as an educational and professional development tool is no longer completely new to medicine and has been embraced, it is still under-researched in terms of various outcomes. Social media plays several key roles in professional development and academic advancement. We reviewed the literature to evaluate how social media can be used for professional development and academic promotion of oncology professionals.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Chemistry 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#301,795
of 23,438,856 outputs
Outputs from JCO Oncology Practice
#21
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,420
of 432,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCO Oncology Practice
#5
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,438,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.